Section of the journal:
Ontology and theory of cognition
Pages:
111-118
Bibliographic description of the article
Kuparashvili, M. J. Y. M. LOTMAN – THE PROBLEM OF HISTORICAL FACT AND NON-WRITTEN CULTURES / M. J. Kuparashvili. – Text : direct //
Innovative Economics and Society. – 2024. – № 2 (44). – С. 111-118
Abstract
Influential and typical interpretations of the problems of history and culture are well known to the interested reader. The underestimated role of the views of Yu. M. Lotman in the analysis of ideas about history, historians and the istoric fact not only impoverishes the postmodern views of modern philosophy, but also closes the possibility of mastering concepts that are not affected by Western representatives of post-modern thought. The original views and methods of analysis of Yu. M. Lotman are devoted to the role of unwritten cultures in the process of evaluating written, and rehabilitate the potential of unconscious thinking, which are usually subtracted from the analysis of history by default due to the fact that this is too dilapidated past. In addition, Y. M. Lotman is not limited to generally accepted linguistic and psychoanalytic trends in the analysis of post-modern concepts and reveals a wide cultural and historical context. The search for alternative variants of the memory of society and history leads Lotman to analyze the phenomenon of non-written cultures, those forms of culture that appeared before culture. Thus, the semiotic concept of culture by Y.M. Lotman is a theory explaining the functional state of culture as a system of signs and symbols.There is plenty of understanding of the need to understand the mechanisms of oral culture within the framework of the postmodern state of philosophy, but only such fateful topics do not become the main ones and acquire not only an ironic, skeptical look, but also constitute the main theme of gaming practices. In the works of Yu.M. Lotman, we meet with a true concern about the state of affairs, with a research search for cultural, historical and semantic foundations for updating the subject and removing the stigma of marginality from them.According to the author of the proposed article, attention to the practice of oral culture is a very important factor in the formation of an ethical paradigm of thinking.
Article keywords
References
Domanska E. Filosofiya istorii posle postmodernizma (Philosophy of history after postmodernism). Moscow: Kanon+, ROOI «Rehabilitation», 2010, 400 p. (In Russian).
Kuparashuili M.D. Mishel\' Fuko: istoriya kak diskursivnaya praktika (Michel Foucault: history as a discursive practice). Alma Mater (bulletin of higher education), 2019, no. 5, pp.5-10 (In Russian).
White H. Metaistoriya: Istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope XIX veka (Metahistory: Historical Imagination in 19th Century). Europe. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House, 2002, 527 p. (In Russian).
Kuparashuili M.D. Versiya Hejdena Uajta (History as rhetoric. Hayden White’s version). «Society: philosophy, history, culture», 2019, no. 4, pp.13-18 (In Russian).
Lotman Yu.M. Izbrannye stat\'i v trekh tomah. T.1. stat\'i po semiotike i tipologii kul\'-tury (Selected articles in three volumes. T.1. articles on semiotics and typology of culture). Tallinn, Alexandra, 1992. (In Russian).
Lotman Yu. M. Vnutri myslyashchih mirov. CHelovek – tekst – semiosfera – istoriya (Inside thinking worlds. Man – text – semiosphere – history). – Moscow : Languages of Russian culture, 1996, 464 p. (In Russian).
Jung K.G. Arhetipy i simvoly (Archetypes and symbols). Moscow: Renaissance, 1991, 298 p. (In Russian).
Kristeva Y. Izbrannye trudy: Razrushenie poetiki (Selected works: Destruction of poetics). Moscow: Rosspan, 2004, 656 p. (In Russian).
McLuhan M. Galaktika Gutenberga. Sotvorenie cheloveka pechatnoj kul\'tury (The Gutenberg Galaxy. The creation of human print culture). Kyiv, Nika-Center Elga, 2004, 431 p. (In Russian).