Section of the journal:
Ontology and theory of cognition
Pages:
88-101
Bibliographic description of the article
Kuparashvili, M. J. ZH. DELEUZE AND F. GUATTARI ON THE SUBJECT AND SUBJECTIVENESS OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY / M. J. Kuparashvili. – Text : direct //
Innovative economics and society. – 2026. – № 1 (51). – С. 88-101
Abstract
The article offers an analysis of the position of modern philosophy in the modern world, paying special attention to the lack of actualization of many fundamental philosophical sections. The views of J. Deleuze and F. Guattari, designed in a supraphilosophical manner, is not only unexpectedly innovative and extremely odious from the point of view of common sense, but also awakens lively thought on the issue of philosophical reflection of the current state of the worldview. Deleuze and Guattari invented a truly postmodern style of thought, introduced a unique terminological apparatus, and forever changed the face of philosophy. The works of Deleuze and Guattari are analyzed within the framework of formal and substantive methodology, based on the opposition between structure and theory of formal logical formalization and the vividly deconstructive construction of worldviews. As important points in the analysis of the works of these authors, the attitude of postmodernity to the problems of thinking is highlighted, which even by default remain the cornerstone in matters of establishing the subject of philosophy. The denial of the traditional properties of philosophy and the introduction of a categorical apparatus, which is equipped with opaque and vague super-categories, practically paralyzes the available explanatory systems, without replacing their field with adequate and timely ones. The assertion of the intrinsic value of continuous thinking is based on the concepts of "pre-philosophy," "becoming," and "schizoid discourse." The analysis of the main concepts on which the logic of "Capitalism and schizophrenia" is based – the concept and plan of immanence – necessarily connect modern scientific terminology to the analysis of the intellectual state of a contemporary. The original principles of the organization of a new subject of philosophy, such as nomadism, rhizomatism and reassembly, assert the priority of surface thinking, and the special relationship of the new philosophy to its subject practically dissolves it in the third person, since the process of cognitive activity of the brain itself does not need a subjective-objective scheme. Despite the controversial and negative nature of the philosophical views of Deleuze and Guattari, they can be very useful in the problem of the formation of philosophical identity in modern conditions, both scientific and socio-political.
Article keywords
References
Kerslake K. On Deleuze\'s Foundation. Logos – Logos, 2020, no. 4, pp. 89-108 (In Russian).
Deleuze J., Guattari F. CHto takoe filosofiya – What is Philosophy? Moscow: Academiche-skii proekt, 2009, 216 p. (In Russian).
Deleuze J. Negotiations – Peregovory. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2004, 233 p. (In Russian).
Deleuze J. Logika smysla – The Logic of Sense. Moscow. D 29 Theatrum philosophicum, 1998, 480 p. (In Russian).
Deleuze J. Maj 68-go ne bylo – May 68 Was Not. Moscow: Ad Marginiem Press, 2016, 96 p. (In Russian).
Deleuze J. Anti-Edip. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya – Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Yekaterinburg, U-Factoria, 2008, 672 p. (In Russian).
Foucault M. Arheologiya znaniya – Archaeology of Knowledge. St. Petersburg: Humanitarian Academy, 2020, 416 p. (In Russian).
Deleuze J. A Tysyacha plato. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya – Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Moscow: RIPOL classic, 2025, 768 p. (In Russian).
Dyakov A.V. Filosofiya post-strukturalizma vo Francii – Philosophy of Post-Structuralism in France. New York: Northern Cross Publishing House, 2008, 364 p. (In Russian).